Introduction
On July 22, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) approved nine spot Ethereum ETF applications. Trading began the following day on major exchanges including the Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE), Nasdaq, and the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). Mirroring the Bitcoin ETF rollout, Coinbase (COIN) serves as the custodian for the majority of these products, with Gemini and Fidelity managing the remaining two.
With the first day of trading concluded, numerous data points have emerged that may indicate the potential impact of these ETFs on Ethereum's price and the broader cryptocurrency market. This analysis focuses on the initial performance of Ethereum spot ETFs and other vital on-chain metrics to provide a comprehensive outlook on possible future trends.
Ethereum Spot ETF vs. Bitcoin Spot ETF: A Comparative Analysis
According to trading data from Bloomberg, the net inflow for Ethereum spot ETFs on the first day approached $107 million, with a total trading volume surpassing $1.1 billion. The top three entrants by net inflow were BlackRock ($266.5M), Bitwise ($204M), and Fidelity ($71.3M). Notably, Grayscale experienced a significant outflow of $484 million, a point of concern for many market observers.
In comparison, the net inflow for Bitcoin spot ETFs on their first day was substantially higher at $655.3 million, though the top three entrants remained the same. The most striking difference was in Grayscale's outflow: while its Bitcoin Trust (GBTC) saw an outflow of just $95 million initially, its Ethereum Trust (ETHE) witnessed outflows nearly five times larger.
Grayscale's strategy involved converting its existing ETHE trust into a spot ETF and simultaneously launching a "mini-trust" seeded with $1 billion from the original fund. This mirrors the approach taken with its Bitcoin product. The company has maintained the ETHE fee at 2.5%, significantly higher than its competitors. In the long term, Grayscale aims to capture both high-net-worth investors (via its high-fee products) and cost-sensitive investors (through low-fee options), thereby broadening its market reach.
Similar to the Bitcoin ETF launch, most issuers are waiving fees for an initial period ranging from six months to a year, or until certain assets-under-management (AUM) thresholds are met. While this is a common market expansion tactic, Grayscale’s dual-tiered fee structure represents a unique competitive strategy. It allows the firm to attract immediate inflows with low fees while preserving profitability through its premium offerings.
Despite this strategy, maintaining ETHE's fee at 2.5% may still lead to substantial outflows, as witnessed with GBTC. Prior to its ETF conversion, GBTC held approximately 620,000 BTC, representing about 3.1% of Bitcoin’s total supply. Post-conversion, its holdings dwindled by 55% to 270,000 BTC, exerting consistent downward pressure on Bitcoin’s price.
Similarly, Grayscale’s Ethereum Trust (ETHE) held about 3 million ETH pre-launch, valued at roughly $10 billion and accounting for 2.5% of ETH’s total supply. While ETHE may experience comparable outflows, market timing and structural adjustments might mitigate the impact. The discount to net asset value (NAV) for ETHE narrowed significantly following the ETF approval news in May, allowing investors to exit near par value. Additionally, the transfer of 10% of ETHE’s assets into the new mini-trust may further cushion long-term outflows.
Ethereum Supply and Demand Dynamics
Ethereum’s diverse ecosystem—including its Proof-of-Stake consensus mechanism, gas fees, DeFi collateral requirements, and Layer-2 network growth—has led to a substantial portion of its supply being locked in various protocols. Of the 120 million ETH currently in circulation, 28% is staked in the consensus layer, and another 11% is locked in smart contracts. In total, nearly 40% of ETH’s supply is considered illiquid.
From an inflation perspective, the second quarter of 2024 saw 107,725 ETH burned and 228,543 ETH issued, resulting in a net supply increase of 120,818 ETH. This inflationary trend can be partly attributed to reduced on-chain fees following the Dencun upgrade and growing Layer-2 activity.
Despite recent inflationary pressures, Ethereum’s long-term supply trajectory remains deflationary. The introduction of spot ETFs could further absorb available supply, potentially creating a supply squeeze. The interplay between limited supply and rising ETF demand may initiate a virtuous cycle, positively influencing ETH’s price. However, the extent of this impact will ultimately depend on the adoption rate of these new financial products.
👉 Explore real-time market data
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a spot Ethereum ETF?
A spot Ethereum ETF is an exchange-traded fund that holds physical Ethereum. It allows investors to gain exposure to ETH's price movements without directly purchasing or storing the cryptocurrency, combining the benefits of crypto investment with the regulatory safeguards of traditional finance.
How did Ethereum ETFs perform on their first trading day?
The combined net inflow for all Ethereum spot ETFs was approximately $107 million, with total volume exceeding $1.1 billion. Major asset managers like BlackRock and Fidelity saw positive inflows, while Grayscale experienced significant outflows due to its higher fee structure.
Why are Grayscale's outflows important?
Grayscale’s ETHE trust converted to an ETF with a 2.5% annual fee, much higher than competitors' waived or low fees. This has led to substantial investor redemptions, which can create selling pressure on ETH if the trust is required to liquidate holdings to meet withdrawals.
What impact could ETFs have on Ethereum's price?
ETF adoption could increase institutional demand, potentially driving up prices. However, short-term volatility may occur due to arbitrage opportunities, market sentiment shifts, or large-scale redemptions from existing trusts like Grayscale’s ETHE.
How does staking affect Ethereum's supply?
Nearly 28% of all ETH is currently staked, meaning it is locked in the consensus layer to secure the network. This reduces liquid supply, and when combined with ETF-driven demand, may create upward pressure on price.
Are Ethereum ETFs a better investment than buying ETH directly?
ETFs offer convenience, regulatory protection, and ease of use for traditional investors. However, they often come with management fees and don’t allow direct use of ETH in DeFi or other applications. Direct ownership offers more flexibility but requires self-custody and technical knowledge.
Conclusion
The debut of Ethereum spot ETFs demonstrated robust trading activity and healthy initial inflows. Moving forward, market participants should monitor Grayscale’s outflow trajectory and its potential impact on ETH’s price. Given the fundamental differences between Bitcoin and Ethereum ecosystems, shifts in supply-demand dynamics and arbitrage activity will also play critical roles in shaping ETH’s market performance.